<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama vs. Clinton: distraction from world reality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thekaufmannpost.net/obama-vs-clinton-distraction-from-world-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thekaufmannpost.net/obama-vs-clinton-distraction-from-world-reality/</link>
	<description>Transparency, corruption and governance matters, evidence-based</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:22:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Roblin</title>
		<link>http://thekaufmannpost.net/obama-vs-clinton-distraction-from-world-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Roblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekaufmannpost.net/obama-vs-clinton-distraction-from-world-reality/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>I definitely think Americans can, partially, be blamed for  the &quot;stupidity and lack of imagination of the people producing the news.&quot;  In my opinion, the &quot;diminishing audience&quot; has very little to do with the lack of reporting of important events occurring outside the country such as the examples listed by Daniel Kaufmann.  What I typically hear is that people are sick of the &quot;blood and guts&quot; and overall &quot;negative press.&quot; I don&#039;t think the decline is due to an unfulfilled appetite for current events occurring outside the country. If there were an appetite, I&#039;m quite confident that the &quot;people producing the news&quot; would meet this demand. Doing so would only increase ratings and, in turn, increase their &quot;bottom line.&quot;  In short, I disagree with you that Americans should not be blamed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think Americans can, partially, be blamed for  the &#8220;stupidity and lack of imagination of the people producing the news.&#8221;  In my opinion, the &#8220;diminishing audience&#8221; has very little to do with the lack of reporting of important events occurring outside the country such as the examples listed by Daniel Kaufmann.  What I typically hear is that people are sick of the &#8220;blood and guts&#8221; and overall &#8220;negative press.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think the decline is due to an unfulfilled appetite for current events occurring outside the country. If there were an appetite, I&#8217;m quite confident that the &#8220;people producing the news&#8221; would meet this demand. Doing so would only increase ratings and, in turn, increase their &#8220;bottom line.&#8221;  In short, I disagree with you that Americans should not be blamed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://thekaufmannpost.net/obama-vs-clinton-distraction-from-world-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thekaufmannpost.net/obama-vs-clinton-distraction-from-world-reality/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t blame American&#039;s for the stupidity and lack of imagination of the people producing the news.  The broadcast industry, including news, is struggling with a diminishing audience. 

You&#039;ve touched on one of the reasons people aren&#039;t tuning in: We aren&#039;t interested in the blather that&#039;s being broadcast. Many Americans are quite aware of the &quot;butterfly&quot; effect, and are quite attuned to events happening around the world.

Oh, one last thing: To say that the Democratic Party nominee is all but decided is a failure to recognize that the culture within Washington DC is unique in America. It exerts tremendous influence, and there is nothing democratic within the theatre of it.  It&#039;s something the news organizations don&#039;t get either, but if you ask Americans who move here, they&#039;ll tell you, &#039;it&#039;s not like home.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t blame American&#8217;s for the stupidity and lack of imagination of the people producing the news.  The broadcast industry, including news, is struggling with a diminishing audience. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve touched on one of the reasons people aren&#8217;t tuning in: We aren&#8217;t interested in the blather that&#8217;s being broadcast. Many Americans are quite aware of the &#8220;butterfly&#8221; effect, and are quite attuned to events happening around the world.</p>
<p>Oh, one last thing: To say that the Democratic Party nominee is all but decided is a failure to recognize that the culture within Washington DC is unique in America. It exerts tremendous influence, and there is nothing democratic within the theatre of it.  It&#8217;s something the news organizations don&#8217;t get either, but if you ask Americans who move here, they&#8217;ll tell you, &#8216;it&#8217;s not like home.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
